History My Car Technical Sources Technical Articles Restoration
Spares Links Clubs Feedback Home

MASCOT March April 2003

Letter

From Bob Andrew

Dear Mike.

This is an article about Roadsters, recent experiences and my personal opinions and comments. First may I say how the Mascot continues to improve and that 1 eagerly await its arrival, as I do the SOC mag.

My low mileage 4AB (Nearly 30,000) underwent some carefully considered changes last summer. It was a highly original car, except the paintwork and some chrome, plus an excellent Bill Haverly fibreglass gearbox cover. The leatherette-covered seats - pre-vynide days, as the car is an early blade bumper model built in 1950 - were in excellent condition but fairly uncomfortable and unpleasant looking material, so I had them reupholstered in leather. Much more comfortable, but colour match not the best with the other trim. I then fitted a narrow-slat 4AD type radiator grille, hoping for better cooling but found no perceptible improvement. Most important of all. Trevor fitted a 4:44 differential and I had the speedo recalibrated. The engine copes perfectly even with a 1 in 3 gradient. The general acceleration appears much better, but of course, making full use of the gears. Top gear acceleration, needless to say, is well down, but mpg on a run is an easy 40 at 50mph cruising, and local is almost 35, which previously was the best I could get on a run!

Bob Andrew's 4ABSince a boy I have always collected road tests and enjoyed comparing performance of different cars. A very good friend of mine in ASCO always refers to the 4AD's as "mousepower". I felt this was a little unkind so I looked up some figures. I will not bore you with too much detail, but the figures from Motor World in the Nov/Dec 02 Mascot show the 1250 and 1500 cc versions of the MG of that time (Car "A" and Car "A" Mk 11 resp -1250cc for Car "A" Mkll is a misprint) were slower than the Singer. 1950s road tests generally confirm the 4AD to have better acceleration by quite some way, though top speed is similar. After all, 0-50 in 13.5 seconds was considered quick in those days - that was a test of a single-carb 4AD in 1951. True to say, a 1954 road test by one magazine recorded 17 seconds for 0-50, but the same car did 14.8 in another magazine. Again, one road test reported the speedo with a small under-read throughout the range, and another car with a small over-read, but both cars and drivers are bound to vary.

Best wishes to you all in ASCO

History My Car Technical Sources Technical Articles Restoration
Spares Links Clubs Feedback Home